ReviewMaterials today. Bio2025
mRNA delivery systems 2.0: Engineering extrahepatic delivery for non-vaccine therapeutics.
Review in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- mRNA Therapeutics Beyond Infectious Diseases: Expanding Therapeutic Applications and Future Perspectives.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2026Review
- Minicircle DNA Vaccines: Overcoming Delivery and Expression Barriers in Next-Generation Immunization.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Integrating CRISPR genome editing with liver organoid and hiPSC-derived microfluidic platforms to model metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026Review
- Industrial Perspective on the Manufacturing of Lipid Nanoparticles for Nucleic Acid Delivery.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Fulfilling multiple roles in PROTAC design: The emerging potential of oligonucleotides.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Review
- Bacterial ghosts (BGs): A promising approach as candidate vaccine.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent breakthroughs in mRNA therapeutics have transformed vaccine development, largely powered by lipid nanoparticle (LNP) based delivery systems. However, these systems exhibit a strong hepatic tropism, making them suboptimal for targeting extrahepatic organs such as the brain, lungs, pancreas, heart, and tumor tissues critical to non-vaccine therapeutic applications. This review explores next-generation delivery strategies designed to overcome liver centric distribution. We highlight emerging platforms, including pKa-tuned LNPs, polymeric and peptide-based carriers, exosomes, and biomimetic vesicles, along with physical enhancement techniques such as ultrasound, laser, and MRI-guided systems. Nonetheless, researchers are achieving more precise delivery to deep seated tissues by integrating these technologies with targeted ligands and responsive release mechanisms. Applications in oncology, cardiology, pulmonology, and neurology are discussed with a focus on preclinical and early clinical outcomes. Regulatory considerations, including immunogenicity, biodistribution, and manufacturing scalability, are also reviewed. Ultimately, this article presents a forward-looking perspective on engineering safe, organ specific mRNA delivery platforms beyond the liver, enabling the advancement of precision therapeutics. This review will provide a timely and comprehensive overview of innovative strategies to overcome these challenges, focusing on non-vaccine applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.