Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438730›Full record

ArticleJournal of blood medicine2025

Resolving Incompatible Blood Cross-Matching: The Role of 37°C Water Bath in Transfusion Safety.

Junling Han, Hongmei Niu, Fuqian Zhao, Rong Yu, Xiang Li, Qing Qi, Mingquan Shang, Hao Yu, Yanfei Cong, Lei Wang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Junling Han *Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Hongmei Niu *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Fuqian Zhao *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Rong YuChifeng Clinical Medical School of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Xiang LiChifeng Clinical Medical School of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Qing QiBaotou Medical College, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Mingquan ShangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Hao YuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Yanfei CongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.
Lei WangPrecision Medicine Sequencing Center, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, Hebei, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4342-8520
Daofu ShenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Chifeng Municipal Hospital, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-5331-6090

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Incompatible cross-matching at room temperature can delay critical blood transfusions. We report that red cells from patients requiring blood transfusion agglutinated after cross-matching at room temperature, but changed from agglutination to dispersion after a water bath at 37°C. The aim was to investigate whether re-cross-matching at 37°C is necessary for some patients with incompatible cross-matching. Methods: This prospective observational study analysed all incompatible cross-matched blood samples at the Blood Transfusion Department of Chifeng Municipal Hospital from 1 May 2024 to 31 July 2024. Cross-matching was performed using a fully automated system and the Polybrene method. For incompatible samples, the Polybrene method was repeated after the samples were placed in a 37°C water bath for 5 minutes. Results: Thirty patients with cross-match incompatibilities were included. Among these, agglutination was reversed after the 37°C water bath in 28 patients, indicating compatibility. Only 2 patients had true blood group incompatibility. We detail the results of one representative patient from the 28 with reversed agglutination. This patient showed agglutination using the fully automated device and the Polybrene method, but not with the saline method. After a 37°C water bath, the agglutinated erythrocytes dispersed into a single-cell state upon microscopic examination. Conclusion: For selected patients, cross-matching at 37°C can resolve false-positive agglutination, ensuring transfusion safety and timely access to blood products. This simple method can be integrated into the clinical cross-matching workflow.

Indexed as

37°C water bathcross-matching incompatibilitiesirregular antibodiespolybrene methodred cell aggregation

Identifiers

PMID41438730
PMCPMC12719051

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.