ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025
Successful ECMO support for cardiogenic shock induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a case report and literature review.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Electrocardiographic changes in immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiac injury: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- The role of glucose metabolic reprogramming in myocarditis and advances in therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated myocarditis is a rare but potentially fatal immune-related adverse event that can rapidly progress to life-threatening arrhythmias and cardiogenic shock, often necessitating mechanical circulatory support. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a critical life-saving intervention in such cases. However, the role of ECMO in treating ICI-associated myocarditis remains underexplored, with limited literature available. Methods: We present a case of fulminant ICI-associated myocarditis with cardiogenic shock successfully managed with ECMO. Additionally, we review and summarize data from 13 ECMO-assisted patients with ICI-associated myocarditis to provide insights into the clinical characteristics, management strategies, and outcomes. Main results: Among the 13 patients (with a mean age 59.08 years), monotherapy using nivolumab or pembrolizumab represented the predominant ICI treatment regimen. The median treatment cycle was 3.0 (IQR: 2.0 ~ 7.0), and the median duration from first administration to myocarditis onset was 77.0 (IQR: 20.5 ~ 250.0) days. The median duration of myocarditis symptoms was 19.0 (IQR: 15.5 ~ 42.5) days. Common presenting symptoms included fever and dyspnea, while most patients exhibited elevated myocardial enzymes and BNP levels, arrhythmias, and an average left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 38.31% at admission. Myocardial biopsy was the primary diagnostic method. In addition to immunosuppressive therapy, most patients also required intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support. The median duration of ECMO and IABP support was 9.0 (IQR: 6.5 ~ 15.5) days and 11.5 (IQR: 7.5 ~ 13.0) days, respectively. Ultimately, nine of the thirteen patients (69.23%) survived. Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates ECMO's potential as a bridge-to-recovery strategy for severe ICI-associated myocarditis with cardiogenic shock. The observed survival rate of 69.23% supports its judicious use in conjunction with prompt immunosuppression. Prospective studies are warranted to optimize ECMO initiation criteria, duration, and combination strategies with other circulatory support modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.