Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438903›Full record

ArticleGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2025

Results of the Cologne Corona Surveillance (CoCoS) project - a cross-sectional study: Survey data on nonadherence to recommended individual behaviours for SARS-CoV-2 pandemic containment.

Max Oberste, Kilian Baumann, Kija Shah-Hosseini, Michael Buess, Kerstin Daniela Rosenberger, Annelene Kossow, Felix Dewald, Jomana Reusch, Teodora Asenova, Florian Neuhann and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Max ObersteInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Kilian BaumannInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Kija Shah-HosseiniInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Michael BuessCologne Health Authority, Cologne, Germany.
Kerstin Daniela RosenbergerInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Annelene KossowCologne Health Authority, Cologne, Germany.
Felix DewaldInstitute of Virology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Jomana ReuschInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Teodora AsenovaInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.
Florian NeuhannCologne Health Authority, Cologne, Germany.
Martin HellmichInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To curb SARS-CoV-2 transmission, citizens were urged to get vaccinated and adhere to hygiene recommendations (keeping distance, washing hands, wearing face masks), as well as informing contacts if infected. Studies confirm the effectiveness of these measures in reducing virus spread. Understanding factors influencing nonadherence is vital for enhancing the efficacy of future pandemic education campaigns. Methods: An online survey assessed nonadherence to SARS-CoV-2 containment recommendations among 30,000 randomly selected Cologne residents aged 18 or older. Invitations were sent on December 7, 2022, with the survey open until January 7, 2023. Logistic regression analyzed associations between participants' sociodemographic, health, and virus-related characteristics and reported nonadherence to recommended behaviors. Results: Out of 30,000 invited Cologne residents, 4,486 (15%) responded, with 10% reporting not having received recommended SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Nonadherence correlated significantly with older age, male gender, low income, living alone, migrant background, and chronic lung disease. 80% reported not adhering to current hygiene recommendations, linked to younger age, absence of certain pre-existing conditions, and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, 16% reported hesitancy in informing all contacts upon testing positive, associated with male gender, absence of certain pre-existing conditions, and fewer booster doses. Conclusion: The results presented here point to which sociodemographic, health, and virus-related factors are associated with nonadherence to recommended individual behaviors to mitigate the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. However, issues related to the representativeness of the sample for the general population limit the validity of the results.Trial registration: DRKS.de, German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), identifier: DRKS00024046, registered on 25 February 2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19Patient ComplianceAdolescentAdultAgedCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansHygieneMaleMasksMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 Vaccinescontact tracingcountermeasureshygieneSARS-CoV-2surveys and questionnairesvaccination

Identifiers

PMID41438903
PMCPMC12720068

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.