ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Personalised Rational Drug Monitoring Combined with KABP Model Health Education to Improve Adherence and Prognosis of CAR-T Cell Therapy.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Complications such as tumor lysis syndrome occur during the Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell treatment process, which adversely affects the treatment effect. The aim of this study is to study the combination of personalised rational medication monitoring and the Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior (KABP) model health education to improve the adherence and prognosis of CAR-T cell therapy. Patients and Methods: 91 patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma who received CAR-T cell therapy in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2024 were included in this single-retrospective study and divided into the control group (n=46, routine care) and the observation group (n=45, routine care + personalised rational medication monitoring combined with KABP model health education) based on the treatment methods. Compliance, clinical treatment efficacy, self-care ability, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior (KAB) scale were compared between the two groups. Results: The observation group demonstrated significantly higher total compliance and clinical efficacy compared to the control group ( Conclusion: This approach proves beneficial in enhancing patient adherence, treatment effectiveness, and quality of life in CAR-T cell therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.