ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Induction of immune education in type 1 diabetes through controlled allogeneic islet rejection at onset: a monocentric open-label pilot study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02505893 (A Monocentric, Open-label Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Minimal Islet Transplantation in Patients With New-onset Type 1 Diabetes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Monocentric, Open-label Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Minimal Islet Transplantation in Patients With New-onset Type 1 Diabetes
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current immunotherapies for type 1 diabetes (T1D) have shown limited success in durably preserving β-cell function. We tested a novel strategy that repurposes allogeneic islet transplantation not for metabolic replacement, but as a platform for antigen-specific immune education. Methods: In this monocentric, open-label pilot study (April 2015-April 2023), six patients with recent-onset T1D received a minimal islet mass (median 3452 IEQ/kg; range 2980-4050) combined with short-term immunomodulation (ATG, transient mTOR inhibition, and G-CSF). The transplanted islet mass was intentionally insufficient for metabolic replacement. The primary endpoint was the change in stimulated 2-h C-peptide AUC at 52 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included immune cell phenotyping, cytokine/chemokine profiling, miR-375 release kinetics, analysis of islet-related autoantibodies, and monitoring of donor-specific HLA antibodies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02505893. Findings: The protocol was safe and well-tolerated. At 12 months, the median stimulated C-peptide AUC was preserved at 91-100% of baseline with all participants achieving a partial clinical remission (IDAA1c ≤ 9). At 5 years, median C-peptide AUC declined to 44-56% of baseline, with 2 patients maintaining stable secretion and 2 retaining ∼50% of initial function. Exploratory analyses demonstrated a structured pattern of immune resetting, with early lymphodepletion followed by memory and regulatory T-cell expansion; transient increases in IL-2 and IL-10; sustained early elevation of sCD25; biphasic miR-375 peaks indicating early β-cell stress; transient increases in autoantibodies without epitope spreading; and donor-specific class I HLA antibodies in five patients, with persistent class II DSA in two. No expansion of CD3 Interpretation: This study introduces a paradigm shift in the use of islet transplantation-transforming it from a metabolic intervention into a tolerogenic stimulus through controlled antigen exposure. Further potentiation with stem-cell-derived islets may enable improved matching, graft modification, and iterative antigen delivery. Funding: Supported by Fondazione Italiana Diabete (FID). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation, manuscript preparation, or decision to publish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.