ReviewCureus2025
The Evolving Landscape of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Prophylaxis in Infants.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility and safety profile of intranasal third-party allogeneic CD45ROFrontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Insights Into monoclonal antibodies and vaccines targeting respiratory viruses.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Throughout human history, respiratory infections have been among the most common illnesses affecting populations worldwide. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is recognized as one of the major pathogens responsible for a significant disease burden in young children and the elderly population, causing lower respiratory tract infections. Initially identified as the chimpanzee coryza virus in the mid-20th century, it was later named human RSV. This review outlines the discovery of RSV, the initial challenges faced in vaccine development, and the evolution of monoclonal antibodies for infants and vaccines for pregnant mothers to prevent RSV infection in infants. Early vaccine trials enhanced respiratory disease and increased mortality among vaccinated infants. There were subsequent failures with live attenuated vaccines. Research turned toward developing the monoclonal antibody palivizumab, which provided the first practical means of protecting high-risk infants against RSV infection. Subsequent advances in monoclonal antibodies, especially nirsevimab, and the advent of the maternal vaccination program with the Bivalent Prefusion F Vaccination have expanded disease prevention to the population level instead of targeting high-risk infants. These advances promise to reduce hospitalizations and severe disease, improving overall community health. Future priorities include ensuring equitable access, maintaining long-term safety surveillance, and integrating RSV prevention into national immunization programs worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.