ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Understanding how users identify health misinformation in short videos: an integrated analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Short-video platforms have become major channels for public access to health information in the digital era. However, the low barriers to content creation and the increasing use of AI-generated content have accelerated the spread of health misinformation, underscoring the need to better understand how users identify health misinformation in short videos. Methods: Grounded theory was applied to analyze 47 in-depth interviews and extract core factors influencing users' recognition of health misinformation in short videos. Based on the derived factor structure, a questionnaire survey was conducted and 279 valid samples were collected. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the proposed relationships, and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was further employed to identify the causal configurations through which different factor combinations contribute to users' health misinformation discernment. Results: The results identified three key categories: information quality, user characteristics, and external environments. The PLS-SEM model demonstrated acceptable explanatory power ( Discussion: The findings highlight three distinct ways users process health misinformation in short videos, including primarily analytical evaluation, peripheral reliance on content cues, and peripheral reliance on cognitive cues. These results suggest practical strategies for mitigating health misinformation on short-video platforms, emphasizing interventions at individual, platform, and policy levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.