Evidence mapPaperPMID 41439102Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Understanding how users identify health misinformation in short videos: an integrated analysis using PLS-SEM and fsQCA.

Ruojia Wang, Huiwen Yang, Yue Wang, Xing Zhai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ruojia WangSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Huiwen YangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Yue WangSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xing ZhaiSchool of Management, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Short-video platforms have become major channels for public access to health information in the digital era. However, the low barriers to content creation and the increasing use of AI-generated content have accelerated the spread of health misinformation, underscoring the need to better understand how users identify health misinformation in short videos. Methods: Grounded theory was applied to analyze 47 in-depth interviews and extract core factors influencing users' recognition of health misinformation in short videos. Based on the derived factor structure, a questionnaire survey was conducted and 279 valid samples were collected. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to test the proposed relationships, and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) was further employed to identify the causal configurations through which different factor combinations contribute to users' health misinformation discernment. Results: The results identified three key categories: information quality, user characteristics, and external environments. The PLS-SEM model demonstrated acceptable explanatory power ( Discussion: The findings highlight three distinct ways users process health misinformation in short videos, including primarily analytical evaluation, peripheral reliance on content cues, and peripheral reliance on cognitive cues. These results suggest practical strategies for mitigating health misinformation on short-video platforms, emphasizing interventions at individual, platform, and policy levels.

Indexed as

CommunicationVideo RecordingAdultFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesfuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA)health information governancehealth misinformationinfluencing factorsPLS-SEMshort videos

Identifiers

PMID41439102
PMCPMC12719425

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.