ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Effect of Light Wavelength on Corneal Sensitivity.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate corneal sensitivity as a potential pathway for blue light-induced ocular discomfort. Design: Cross-sectional study. Subjects: Healthy adult volunteers without previous ocular medical history. Methods: Subjects were exposed to a Hue A19 LED bulb calibrated for equivalent photo flux for 450 nm (blue) and 620 nm (red) wavelengths. Corneal sensitivity measurements via a 0.12-mm filament Cochet-Bonet esthesiometer were ascertained after 1 minute of exposure and throughout testing. The order of exposed wavelength was randomized, with a 5-minute rest interval between exposure to each wavelength of light. Main Outcome Measures: Cochet-Bonnet measurements of (1) threshold to sensation, (2) discrimination, and (3) threshold to pain. Threshold to sensation was determined by the longest filament length at which the subject noted consistent initial sensation. Discrimination was determined by changing the filament length by 5-mm increments (both retraction and extension) until the subject was able to correctly and consistently distinguish less, greater, or equal sensation compared with the previous application. Threshold to pain was determined at the filament length at which the participant expressed pain or discomfort. Results: There was no difference in threshold to sensation between blue (450 nm) and red (620 nm) light sources ( Conclusions: Blue- versus red-light exposure decreases subjective corneal pain threshold when measured by the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Altered corneal sensitivity may mediate blue light-induced ocular discomfort. The Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer is a useful tool in the study of blue light-induced discomfort. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.