ReviewFEMS microbiology ecology2025
Subsurface microbiology and the pressing societal need to support future exploration.
Review in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Groundwater microbial communities across the terrestrial subsurface.Nature microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Subsurface microbiology is at a crossroads, evolving from asking 'who's home' to seeking clarity on microbes' functionality and the key processes that constrain subsurface life. Importantly, the processes subsurface microorganisms mediate are central to societal needs to mitigate climate change and address waste storage, as proposed solutions to both involve subsurface habitats. However, subsurface sampling opportunities and funding remain limited and, in some cases, have diminished. This perspective article is aimed at scientists who have or might develop an interest in the geomicrobiology of the subsurface, for funding agencies worldwide, and for scientists and engineers engaged in the extractive and waste disposal industries. It briefly reviews subsurface science's history and current status and proposes some actions for moving forward. In particular, we see the continued need for engaging early-career microbiologists in drilling projects, increasing access through industry partnerships, microbiology-led drilling projects, and creating interdisciplinary drilling projects by including microbiologists during the drilling project planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.