ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative CFD Simulations of a Soft Robotic Fish for Undulatory Swimming Behaviors.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) have gained momentum in recent years, and a special type of AUV, the robotic fish, has become a significant topic, with a superior maneuverability to traditional AUVs. In this paper, a prediction strategy for the hydrodynamic performance of a robotic fish to analyze undulatory swimming behaviors is proposed. The two-dimensional robotic fish model for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations is constructed, and a dynamic network method is applied to orient the generated network based on the wavy motion. For the thrust force of the fin, a body traveling wave is derived. In the simulations, the effects of kinematic parameters such as flapping frequency and speed on swimming efficiency and drag are analyzed, and thrust force production, power expenditure, and overall efficiency of swimming are examined. Later, a deep learning-based prediction model is designed from the obtained parameters, and force predictions are performed. Long short-term memory (LSTM)-, convolutional neural network (CNN)-, and gated recurrent network (GRU)-based time series prediction models are used, and their variations are compared. In these experiments, while the CNN-GRU achieves the higher prediction performance for the root mean square error, with 0.0228, other approaches give a lower performance, between 0.0233 and 0.0359. The proposed method demonstrates a superior performance in CNN and LSTM models and exhibits lower prediction errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.