ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Hybrid Convolutional Vision Transformer for Robust Low-Channel sEMG Hand Gesture Recognition: A Comparative Study with CNNs.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hand gesture classification using surface electromyography (sEMG) is fundamental for prosthetic control and human-machine interaction. However, most existing studies focus on high-density recordings or large gesture sets, leaving limited evidence on performance in low-channel, reduced-gesture configurations. This study addresses this gap by comparing a classical convolutional neural network (CNN), inspired by Atzori's design, with a Convolutional Vision Transformer (CViT) tailored for compact sEMG systems. Two datasets were evaluated: a proprietary Myo-based collection (10 subjects, 8 channels, six gestures) and a subset of NinaPro DB3 (11 transradial amputees, 12 channels, same gestures). Both models were trained using standardized preprocessing, segmentation, and balanced windowing procedures. Results show that the CNN performs robustly on homogeneous signals (Myo: 94.2% accuracy) but exhibits increased variability in amputee recordings (NinaPro: 92.0%). In contrast, the CViT consistently matches or surpasses the CNN, reaching 96.6% accuracy on Myo and 94.2% on NinaPro. Statistical analyses confirm significant differences in the Myo dataset. The objective of this work is to determine whether hybrid CNN-ViT architectures provide superior robustness and generalization under low-channel sEMG conditions. Rather than proposing a new architecture, this study delivers the first systematic benchmark of CNN and CViT models across amputee and non-amputee subjects using short windows, heterogeneous signals, and identical protocols, highlighting their suitability for compact prosthetic-control systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.