Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440016›Full record

ReviewCells2025

Next-Generation HDAC Inhibitors: Advancing Zinc-Binding Group Design for Enhanced Cancer Therapy.

Mohammed Hawash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mohammed HawashDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, An-Najah National University, Nablus 00433, Palestine.ORCID 0000-0001-5640-9700

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are pivotal epigenetic regulators that control gene expression, cell proliferation, and differentiation, and their dysregulation is closely associated with the onset and progression of multiple cancers. The therapeutic importance of these enzymes is reflected by FDA approval of HDAC inhibitors for oncology indications. Despite this clinical success, most FDA-approved agents employ conventional zinc-binding groups (ZBGs) such as hydroxamic acid and 2-aminoanilide, which are frequently linked to metabolic instability, genotoxicity, and poor pharmacokinetic behavior. These limitations have spurred the development of structurally diverse and safer HDAC inhibitors incorporating alternative ZBGs. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of recently developed HDAC inhibitors reported in the last few years, emphasizing their structure-activity relationships (SARs), chemical scaffolds, and binding features-including cap, linker, and ZBG motifs. Both hydroxamate-based and non-hydroxamate inhibitors, such as benzamides, hydrazides, and thiol-containing analogs, are critically evaluated. Moreover, the potency and selectivity profiles of these inhibitors are summarized across different cancer and normal cell lines, as well as specific HDAC isoforms, providing a clearer understanding of their therapeutic potential. Emerging dual-target HDAC inhibitors, such as HDAC-tubulin, HDAC-PI3K and HDAC-CDK hybrids, are also discussed for their synergistic anticancer effects.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug DesignHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsNeoplasmsZincAnimalsHistone DeacetylasesHumansStructure-Activity RelationshipAntineoplastic AgentsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesZincanticancercellshistone deacetylaseshydroxamatenon-hydroxamate inhibitorsSARzinc-binding groups

Identifiers

PMID41440016
PMCPMC12731643

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.