Evidence mapPaperPMID 41440021Full record

ReviewCells2025

Graphene and Its Derivatives as Modulators of Macrophage Polarization in Cutaneous Wound Healing.

Iwona Lasocka, Michał Skibniewski, Iwona Pasternak, Anna Wróblewska, Zuzanna Biernacka, Ewa Skibniewska, Lidia Szulc-Dąbrowska, Marie Hubalek Kalbacova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Iwona LasockaDepartment of Biology of Animal Environment, Institute of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.
Michał SkibniewskiDepartment of Morphological Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9578-2476
Iwona PasternakFaculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-4593
Anna WróblewskaFaculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, 00-662 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3728-1216
Zuzanna BiernackaDepartment of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8729-1207
Ewa SkibniewskaDepartment of Biology of Animal Environment, Institute of Animal Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1299-1254
Lidia Szulc-DąbrowskaDepartment of Preclinical Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-786 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5436-6556
Marie Hubalek KalbacovaInstitute of Pathological Physiology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 128 53 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-2218

Funding

Cooperation Program of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic in the research area of "Physiology and Pathophysiology Cooperation Program of Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic in the research area of "Physiology and PathophysiologyNational Science Centre 2022/06/X/NZ3/00289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphene-based materials (GBMs), owing to their excellent biomedical properties, can significantly advance the development of nano-biodressings. Their unique physicochemical features, such as high surface area, tunable functionalization, antimicrobial activity, and ability to interact with immune cells, suggest that GBMs may influence key biological processes involved in tissue repair, particularly the immune response. Building on this growing evidence, the aim of this review is to demonstrate that GBMs can serve as tools for modulating macrophage polarization as a strategy for promoting wound healing. We present the mechanisms by which GBMs penetrate macrophages and discuss the effects of GBMs, either in suspension or as scaffolds/grounds/substrates, on macrophage polarization. Moreover, we propose mechanisms underlying the actions of different forms of GBMs on macrophage polarization. Nevertheless, a multitude of uncertainties and significant challenges remain. Chief among these are the pronounced heterogeneity of GBM subtypes, the necessity for exhaustive characterization and in-depth analysis, the formulation of robust experimental designs, and the careful selection of models capable of accurately delineating macrophage populations and guiding their polarization toward achieving targeted wound healing outcomes. This review attempts to systematize and clarify these issues.

Indexed as

Cell PolarityGraphiteMacrophagesSkinWound HealingAnimalsHumansGraphitebiomaterialcytocompatibilitycytotoxicityplasticityskin

Identifiers

PMID41440021
PMCPMC12731964

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.