ArticleBrain sciences2025
Stent-Assisted Coiling vs. Flow Diversion in Unruptured Anterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Single-Center Cohort Study.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeStent-assisted coiling (SAC) achieves immediate aneurysm occlusion, while flow diversion (FD) promotes progressive remodeling. Comparative data in unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms remain limited.
methodsA retrospective review of our institutional database was conducted between 2021 and 2024. A total of 129 aneurysms treated with SAC (n = 33) or FD (n = 96) were identified and included in the analysis. Outcomes included angiographic occlusion, retreatment, complications, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on sex, age, aneurysm size, and location (caliper 0.2, exact sex matching).
resultsA total of 130 patients (89 women, 41 men) were included in the study, with a mean age of 59.8 years (range 22-81). In the full cohort, SAC achieved higher immediate complete occlusion (62.5% vs. 8.3%,
conclusionsSAC offers rapid angiographic exclusion but at the cost of higher retreatment. FD ensures durable occlusion and absence of retreatment, with a consistent safety profile. After stratification by technical complexity, excess morbidity associated with SAC originated from anatomically demanding multistent constructs, whereas single-stent SAC showed safety comparable to FD. Age may influence periprocedural risk, particularly with SAC. These findings reinforce a tailored strategy: "Close fast with SAC, close forever with FD."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.