ArticleBrain sciences2025
Temporal Capsule Feature Network for Eye-Tracking Emotion Recognition.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eye Tracking (ET) parameters, as physiological signals, are widely applied in emotion recognition and show promising performance. However, emotion recognition relying on ET parameters still faces several challenges: (1) insufficient extraction of temporal dynamic information from the ET parameters; (2) a lack of sophisticated features with strong emotional specificity, which restricts the model's robustness and individual generalization capability. To address these issues, we propose a novel Temporal Capsule Feature Network (TCFN) for ET parameter-based emotion recognition. The network incorporates a Window Feature Module to extract Eye Movement temporal dynamic information and a specialized Capsule Network Module to mine complementary and collaborative relationships among features. The MLP Classification Module realizes feature-to-category conversion, and a Dual-Loss Mechanism is integrated to optimize overall performance. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the proposed model: the average accuracy reaches 83.27% for Arousal and 89.94% for Valence (three-class tasks) on the eSEE-d dataset, and the accuracy rate of four-category across-session emotion recognition is 63.85% on the SEED-IV dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.