Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41440155›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of investigation in health, psychology and education2025

The Assessment of the Dissociation of Intimacy: Development and Psychometric Properties of the Dissociation of Intimacy Questionnaire (DIQ).

Vincenzo Caretti, Eleonora Topino, Andrea Fontana, Adriano Schimmenti, Alessio Gori

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincenzo CarettiDepartment of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, Via della Traspontina, 21, 00193 Rome, Italy.
Eleonora TopinoDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, Mercatorum University, Piazza Mattei, 10, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0849-1249
Andrea FontanaDepartment of Human Sciences, LUMSA University, Via della Traspontina, 21, 00193 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7326-1696
Adriano SchimmentiDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, UKE-Kore University of Enna, Cittadella Universitaria, 94100 Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5181-2648
Alessio GoriDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Via di San Salvi 12, Pad. 26, 50135 Firenze, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimacy is a core domain of personality functioning, but it can be compromised by defensive and dissociative processes. Given this, the present study aimed to develop and validate the Dissociation of Intimacy Questionnaire (DIQ), a multidimensional self-report instrument assessing dissociative disruptions of intimacy. The DIQ consists of two parallel forms ("Me with Others" and "Others with Me") developed to capture five distinct dimensions of the dissociation of intimacy: emotional, psychological, physical, social, and sexual. The sample comprised 500 participants (74% females;

Indexed as

alexithymiaattachmentclosenessdissociationinterpersonal functioningintimacy

Identifiers

PMID41440155
PMCPMC12731346

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.