ReviewBiosensors2025
Nanomaterial Engineered Biosensors and Stimulus-Responsive Platform for Emergency Monitoring and Intelligent Diagnosis.
Review in Biosensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Highly Sensitive Electrochemical Immunosensor Based on Core-Shell SiOFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recent advances in hybrid nano-interfaces for environmental pollutant detection: design principles, signal transduction, and analytical performance.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biosensing technology serves as a cornerstone in biomedical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, personalized medicine, and wearable devices, playing an indispensable role in precise detection and real-time monitoring. Compared with traditional sensing platforms, functional nanomaterials-by virtue of their ultra-large specific surface area, exceptional optoelectronic properties, and superior catalytic activity-significantly enhance the sensitivity, selectivity, and response speed of biosensors. This has enabled ultrasensitive, rapid, and even in situ detection of disease biomarkers, pollutants, and pathogens. This review summarizes recent advances in five key categories of functional nanomaterials-metallic, semiconductor, carbon-based, two-dimensional, and stimulus-responsive materials-for advanced biosensing applications. It elucidates the structure-property relationships governing sensing performance, such as the surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles and the high carrier mobility of graphene, and analyzes the core mechanisms behind optical sensing, electrochemical sensing, and emerging multimodal sensing strategies. With a focus on medical diagnostics, wearable health monitoring, and environmental and food safety surveillance, the review highlights the application value of functional nanomaterials across diverse scenarios. Current research is progressively moving beyond single-performance optimization toward intelligent design, multifunctional integration, and real-world deployment, though challenges related to industrial application remain. Finally, the review outlines existing issues in the development of functional nanomaterial-based biosensors and offers perspectives on the integration of nanomaterials with cutting-edge technologies and the construction of novel sensing systems. This work aims to provide insights for the rational design of functional nanomaterials and the cross-disciplinary translation of biosensing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.