ReviewAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Recent Developments in Monoclonal-Antibody-Based Biologic Therapy for Severe Refractory Eosinophilic Asthma.
Review in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsthma exhibits marked heterogeneity both clinically and at the molecular phenotypic level, requiring specifically targeted treatments to block the key pathways of the disease. Monoclonal-antibody-based biologics targeted at critical inflammatory pathways of T2 inflammation such as IL-5, IL-5R, IL-4, and IL-13 are increasingly regarded as effective treatments for severe refractory eosinophilic asthma.
methodsThis review provides an update on the potential of straightforward and reproducible biomarkers to aid in the selection of the biologic-based therapy most likely to be effective in patients with severe or refractory eosinophilic asthma based on English-language original articles in PubMed or MedLine.
resultsMonoclonal-antibody-based biologic therapies have revolutionised severe asthma management, enabling reductions in symptoms that include exacerbations, discontinuation of oral corticosteroids, improved lung function, and enhanced quality of life. Significant clinical effects with anti-IL-5 or -IL-4/13 monoclonal antibodies are more likely to be seen when simple predictive biomarkers such as serum periostin, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), or blood eosinophil counts are used to aid in the identification of those patients with severe refractory eosinophilic asthma who are most likely to benefit from biologic therapies.
conclusionsBiologic-based therapy aimed at T2 inflammation benefits patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, particularly when guided by biomarkers that do not require direct sampling of the airways to target therapy, who are most likely to benefit from these treatments, with good safety profiles for these therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.