ArticleAudiology research2025
Cochlear Implants and Adult Patient Experiences, Adaptation and Challenges: A Survey.
Article in Audiology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline Differences in Cochlear Implant Candidates: Bilateral Traditional vs. Expanded Indications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Sociodemographic disparities and clinical predictors of cochlear implant quality of life: evidence from Saudi Arabia.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCochlear implants (CIs) are a life-changing treatment for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss, yet adult CI uptake remains low despite high clinical and economic effectiveness. This study investigates adult patient experiences, adaptation, and barriers to CI access in Saudi Arabia.
methodsA survey of 89 adult CI recipients was conducted across three major CI centers in Saudi Arabia. The electronic questionnaire explored pre- and post-implant experiences, including referral pathways, device choice, adaptation, and satisfaction. Descriptive statistics, ranked correlations, and inferential tests were used to analyze associations between demographic and clinical variables.
resultsThe median time between hearing loss diagnosis and implantation was 17 years, with most patients using hearing aids beforehand. Healthcare professionals were the primary source of CI interest for 48% of respondents, though younger recipients were more often influenced by peers. Longer daily device use was linked to faster acclimatization (ρ = -0.26,
conclusionsDespite expanded CI availability in Saudi Arabia, structural and societal barriers persist. Empowering healthcare professionals and utilizing social media for awareness may enhance adult CI uptake and improve hearing health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.