ArticleJournal of imaging2025
Application of Generative Adversarial Networks to Improve COVID-19 Classification on Ultrasound Images.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
COVID-19 screening is crucial for the early diagnosis and treatment of the disease, with lung ultrasound posing as a cost-effective alternative to other imaging techniques. Given the dependency on medical expertise and experience to accurately identify patterns in ultrasound exams, deep learning techniques have been explored for automatically classifying patients' conditions. However, the limited availability of public medical databases remains a significant obstacle to the development of more advanced models. To address the data scarcity problem, this study proposes a method that leverages generative adversarial networks (GANs) to generate synthetic lung ultrasound images, which are subsequently used to train frame-based classification models. Two types of GANs are considered: Wasserstein GANs (WGAN) and Pix2Pix. Specific tools are used to show that the synthetic data produced present a distribution close to the original data. The classification models trained with synthetic data achieved a peak accuracy of 96.32% ± 4.17%, significantly outperforming the maximum accuracy of 82.69% ± 10.42% obtained when training only with the original data. Furthermore, the best results are comparable to, and in some cases surpass, those reported in recent related studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.