ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
From Autologous Bone Tissue to Bioengineered Material Solutions in Post-Traumatic Orbital Wall Reconstruction: An Overview.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Collagen-Inducing Compounds from Chihuahuan Desert Plants for Potential Skin Bioink 3D Printing Applications: A Narrative Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orbital wall fractures are a common consequence of trauma-related craniofacial injuries. Multistage treatment and poor functional and aesthetic results render the reconstruction of an orbit extremely challenging. Advances in surgical technologies, imaging software, and biomaterials have continuously improved outcomes. The choice of materials plays a critical role in patient outcomes. Over time, the type of material involved advanced from autografts (autologous tissues such as bone grafts and muscle flaps) to allografts (metals, ceramics, plastic materials, or combinations of these materials). In this study, we provide a comprehensive overview of the latest scientific insights, including the advantages and disadvantages of each material used in terms of stability, cost, safety, biocompatibility, durability, and intraoperative readiness. Bioengineered solutions seem to be the future of orbital wall reconstruction; both material and technological innovations hold promise for further advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.