ReviewJournal of functional biomaterials2025
Rat Calvarial Guided Bone Regeneration Model: Preclinical Insights into Biomaterials, Barrier Design, and Systemic Modulators.
Review in Journal of functional biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-situ Damascus-patterning enables tunable surface electric fields for bioactive titanium implants.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) plays a key role in alveolar ridge augmentation and implant therapy, but the biological mechanisms governing its outcomes are not fully understood. Preclinical animal models provide critical insights that cannot be obtained in early human studies. Over the past 15 years, our group has developed and optimized a standardized rat calvarial GBR model using plastic caps, enabling reproducible and quantitative evaluation of bone regeneration through micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry. The present narrative review synthesizes the findings from our body of work. Our studies demonstrated that advanced substitutes such as hydroxyapatite/collagen composites and carbonate apatite provide favorable outcomes, indicating that local and systemic application of growth factors or parathyroid hormone can markedly enhance augmentation, and that barrier permeability critically modulates angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Moreover, systemic conditions such as nicotine exposure and estrogen deficiency profoundly compromise regenerative outcomes but can be partly mitigated by pharmacological interventions. Finally, regenerated bone within GBR spaces is biologically competent, although it remains less mature than native cortical bone. Together, these insights highlight the translational value of our GBR model and indicate the integration of spatial omics for the elucidation of the cellular mechanisms that will guide future regenerative strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.