ReviewJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Treating Onychomycosis with Efinaconazole: Considerations for Diverse Patient Groups.
Review in Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Onychomycosis is a common nail disease that manifests with varying severity and frequency in specific patient populations, warranting a personalized treatment approach. Novel topical antifungals, such as efinaconazole 10% approved for use in North America and Japan, offer a safe treatment option for many of these patients, though real-world use requires special considerations. In this scoping review, a literature search was conducted in October 2025 using PubMed, Embase (Ovid), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science (Core Collection). In children and adolescents (≥6 years), efinaconazole 10% has shown higher efficacy rates than in adults, possibly attributed to less nail trauma, thinner nail plates, and faster nail growth. In the elderly, a mycological response can precede visual nail improvements, which may require extending treatment beyond the standard 48-week regimen, along with intermittent maintenance therapies. Although antifungal resistance is a concern, dermatophytes-including terbinafine-resistant strains-have generally shown high susceptibility to efinaconazole. In diabetic individuals, onychomycosis should be treated promptly to prevent secondary complications. Efinaconazole 10% showed similar efficacy in this population, regardless of glycemic control. In historically underserved populations, efinaconazole 10% showed no significant difference in efficacy for Latino/Hispanic patients, though further research is needed. Overall, efinaconazole 10% solution was well-tolerated across patient groups, with application-site reactions occurring without systemic sequalae. Healthcare providers are advised to check for concomitant tinea pedis, which increases the risk of relapse or re-infection, and advise patients on nail polish use, which may degrade after topical antifungal application. A shared decision-making framework can help improve treatment compliance and patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.