ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2025
Management Strategies for Failed Pilon Fractures: A Personalized Approach to Revision Reconstruction.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct Patient Characteristics and Risk Profiles in Upper vs. Lower Leg Fractures: Insights from a Comprehensive Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in staged protocols and fixation techniques, treatment of pilon fractures remains a significant challenge in orthopedic trauma, with up to 21% of patients requiring revision surgery. Management of a pilon fracture that has failed initial treatment involves navigating a myriad of complicating variables, including infection, bone loss, malalignment, and nonunion. Although no single surgical approach can be aptly applied to the broad range of pathology and severity spanned by these patients, this narrative review provides a systematic framework for developing a revision pilon reconstruction plan. We present a protocol for pre-operative assessment and review current techniques for infection eradication, bone defect management, deformity correction, and joint-preserving versus joint-sparing surgery. These fundamental strategies form the foundation of a successful salvage plan and can be personalized to address specific fracture morphology, host factors, and goals of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.