ReviewMembranes2025
Advancements and Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Material Science and Membrane Technology: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Membranes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- An Offline Digital-Twin-Assisted Decision-Support Framework for Dynamic RO Under Kuwait Solar-Availability Conditions.Membranes · 2026Article
- Membrane Separation Techniques for Plant Essential Oils: Theory, Performance Comparison, and Application-An Updated Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Reactive Polymeric Membranes for Advanced Water Treatment: Bridging Mechanisms, Kinetics and Scalable Deployment.Polymers · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Membrane technologies play a vital role in sustainable development due to their efficiency in separation, purification, and chemical processing applications. However, the discovery and optimization of new membrane materials remain largely reliant on trial-and-error experimentation, limiting the pace of innovation. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being applied to overcome these limitations by enabling data-driven insights, predictive modeling, and rapid material design. These computational approaches have shown significant promise in accelerating membrane fabrication, improving process simulation, detecting and mitigating fouling, and enhancing membrane characterization. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the recent advancements in the integration of AI and ML within membrane and material science. Fundamental AI and ML concepts relevant to membrane science are discussed, together with their applications in membrane fabrication, performance prediction, process modeling, fouling control, and membrane design. Challenges related to data quality, model interpretability, and the integration of domain-specific knowledge are also highlighted, along with potential future research directions. Compared with conventional empirical approaches, the advantages of AI and ML in handling complex, multivariate datasets and accelerating innovation are demonstrated. Overall, this review underscores the transformative potential of AI and ML in developing next-generation membranes with improved efficiency, selectivity, and sustainability across various industrial applications. Although several reviews have explored ML applications in membrane processes, comprehensive integration across material design, fabrication, fouling control, optimization, and process modeling remains limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.