ReviewMuscles (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Musculoskeletal Pain Syndromes: A Systematic Review.
Review in Muscles (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Mild Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Are Not Synonymous: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal pain syndromes (MPSs) represent a major cause of disability and reduced quality of life, and conventional therapeutic approaches often provide only partial or temporary relief. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) delivered as 100% oxygen at 1.3-2.5 ATA, has been proposed to modulate inflammatory processes and enhance tissue repair. This review evaluated the effectiveness of HBOT on pain, function, quality of life, and physiological outcomes in individuals with MPS.
methodsThis systematic review was conducted in different databases between June 30 and 30 September 2025, following PRISMA guidelines and was previously registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251073730). Studies published in English, Spanish, or Portuguese evaluating HBOT as a standalone or adjunctive intervention were included. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed using PEDro, NIH, and RoB 2.0 tools, and certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE.
resultsEighteen studies (17 RCTs and 1 case series;
conclusionsHBOT may provide adjunctive benefits in musculoskeletal pain syndromes, yet the current evidence remains limited. Standardized treatment protocols and high-quality trials are needed to better define its clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.