Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441664›Full record

ArticleVaccines2025

Disease and Economic Burden Averted by Hib Vaccination in 160 Countries: A Machine-Learning Analysis.

Dachuang Zhou, Siyang Chan, Yimei Zhong, Zhehong Xu, Jun Wang, Yuntian Wang, Yiyang Gao, Yuting Xia, Di Zhang, Wenxi Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dachuang ZhouCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Siyang ChanCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Yimei ZhongCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Zhehong XuPaula and Gregory Chow Institute for Studies in Economics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China.
Jun WangState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Molecular Imaging Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China.
Yuntian WangThe State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Yiyang GaoCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Yuting XiaCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Di ZhangCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.
Wenxi TangCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing 211198, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3564-3626

Funding

Gates Foundation 2023YFVA1002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal immunization against Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) has expanded with Gavi support. We estimated health, economic benefits, equity and cost-effectiveness in 159 countries (1990-2021), and projected effects of future introduction in China.

methodsWe used a random forest model to simulate counterfactual scenarios without Hib vaccine introduction in 159 countries (1990-2021) and to project effects of Hib vaccine introduction in China over the next decade. Ten variables were sourced from the World Bank and WHO; Hib disease burden estimates were from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. We compared counterfactual and actual results to quantify benefits, equity, and cost-effectiveness. Extensive uncertainty analyses were performed.

resultsBetween 1990 and 2021, Hib immunization averted an estimated 1,321,123 (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 32,034-2,723,304) deaths and 90,973,504 (95% UI 3,573,718-197,099,799) disability-adjusted life-years globally. Greatest health and economic gains occurred in Africa and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Deaths averted decreased with later vaccine introduction (Pearson's r = -0.56). Vaccination did not improve health equity, and access remains limited in Africa and LMICs. Hib immunization was cost-saving in all countries. In China, introduction at any point in the next decade would provide health and economic benefits and be cost-effective, with earlier introduction yielding greater gains.

conclusionsHib immunization provide substantial, cost-effective health and economic benefits globally. Persistent inequities in vaccine access for LMICs require targeted solutions. Policymakers in China should consider these findings for future vaccine introduction.

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessHaemophilus influenzae type bvaccination

Identifiers

PMID41441664
PMCPMC12737673

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.