Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41441739›Full record

ReviewJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2026

Defensive medicine in dermatological practice - Dermatopathology as a mirror of structural challenges.

Cornelia Sigrid Lissi Müller, Torsten Hansen, Claus Renzelmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Digital Pathology in Dermatology - Current Status, Applications and Perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cornelia Sigrid Lissi MüllerMedical Care Center for Histology, Cytology, and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, Germany.
Torsten HansenMedical Care Center for Histology, Cytology, and Molecular Diagnostics, Trier, Germany.
Claus RenzelmannLaw firm specializing in pathology law, Wuppertal, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defensive medicine refers to diagnostic or therapeutic actions taken primarily to reduce legal liability rather than to benefit the patient. In dermatopathology, defensive practices manifest in frequent immunohistochemical testing, overly cautious report phrasing, and reliance on multidisciplinary tumor boards. Underlying causes include diagnostic uncertainty, guideline ambiguity, legal pressures, and financial incentives. These behaviors can lead to overtreatment and rising healthcare costs without improving diagnostic accuracy. This manuscript advocates for a balanced, evidence-based diagnostic approach, emphasizing appropriate indications, improved clinicopathologic correlation, and the need for further subspecializing. Dermatopathology is presented as a paradigmatic discipline that highlights both the challenges and potential of defensive diagnostic behavior. Enhancing legal understanding, promoting structured decision-making, and strengthening diagnostic confidence may help to reduce unnecessary testing and support high-quality, patient-centered care.

Indexed as

Defensive MedicineDermatologySkin DiseasesHumansLiability, LegalArtificial intelligence (AI)defensive medicinedermatopathologydiagnostic variabilitymedical liabilitymetacognitionoverdiagnosis and underdiagnosis

Identifiers

PMID41441739
PMCPMC12968948

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.