Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41442759›Full record

SynthesisThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025

Clarifying healthy aging: building a common language for policy innovation within the Age-It Research Program.

Alberto Catalano, Gregory W Gilcrease, Alessandra Macciotta, Lorenzo Milani, Gianluca Aimaretti, Aleksandra Torbica, Savino Sciascia, Fulvio Ricceri

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Aging well in an aging society: Italy at the forefront of global aging and the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberto CatalanoDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2597-2060
Gregory W GilcreaseDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra MacciottaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo MilaniDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2185-2179
Gianluca AimarettiDepartment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy.
Aleksandra TorbicaDepartment of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8938-7608
Savino SciasciaDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1266-9441
Fulvio RicceriDepartment of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8749-9737

Funding

Ageing Well in an Ageing Society DM 1557 11.10.2022Ministry of University and ResearchNational Recovery and Resilience PlanNext Generation EU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to map and classify the definitions of "healthy ageing" (HA) employed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past decade, and to identify conceptual and methodological trends, with the goal of informing future research and policy efforts toward harmonization.

methodsA systematic review of HA definitions was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was designed, refined, and executed using Medline (Ovid) up to July 19, 2024. The primary search term was "healthy aging," with results filtered specifically for RCTs.

resultsOf 38,219 records initially retrieved, 1,588 were screened, and 48 met the inclusion criteria. No unified definition of HA was identified. Instead, three main types emerged: (a) multidimensional definitions with qualitative assessments (29.2%), (b) multidimensional definitions with quantitative assessments (27.0%), and (c) condition- or disease-specific definitions (43.8%). The most common intervention targets were active aging (29.2%), nutritional supplementation (14.6%), cognitive decline (12.5%), and physical activity (12.5%). Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the domains (e.g., physical, cognitive, psychological, and social) and the tools used to assess HA. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight substantial conceptual variability in how HA is defined and measured in RCTs. This diversity reflects the multidimensional and context-dependent nature of HA but poses challenges for synthesis and comparison across studies. A shared framework for defining HA in interventional research is needed to support evidence-based aging policies. By mapping the range of operational definitions used in RCTs, this review provides a foundation for standardizing future HA research.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHealthy AgingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTerminology as TopicAgedAgingHumansHealthy ageing definitionPoliciesRandomized controlled trialSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41442759
PMCPMC12737000

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.