SynthesisThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025
Clarifying healthy aging: building a common language for policy innovation within the Age-It Research Program.
Synthesis in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aging well in an aging society: Italy at the forefront of global aging and the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to map and classify the definitions of "healthy ageing" (HA) employed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) over the past decade, and to identify conceptual and methodological trends, with the goal of informing future research and policy efforts toward harmonization.
methodsA systematic review of HA definitions was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was designed, refined, and executed using Medline (Ovid) up to July 19, 2024. The primary search term was "healthy aging," with results filtered specifically for RCTs.
resultsOf 38,219 records initially retrieved, 1,588 were screened, and 48 met the inclusion criteria. No unified definition of HA was identified. Instead, three main types emerged: (a) multidimensional definitions with qualitative assessments (29.2%), (b) multidimensional definitions with quantitative assessments (27.0%), and (c) condition- or disease-specific definitions (43.8%). The most common intervention targets were active aging (29.2%), nutritional supplementation (14.6%), cognitive decline (12.5%), and physical activity (12.5%). Considerable heterogeneity was observed in the domains (e.g., physical, cognitive, psychological, and social) and the tools used to assess HA. DISCUSSION: The findings highlight substantial conceptual variability in how HA is defined and measured in RCTs. This diversity reflects the multidimensional and context-dependent nature of HA but poses challenges for synthesis and comparison across studies. A shared framework for defining HA in interventional research is needed to support evidence-based aging policies. By mapping the range of operational definitions used in RCTs, this review provides a foundation for standardizing future HA research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.