ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2025
Participatory approach, dissemination, and implementation of research on aging: the Age-It experience.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aging well in an aging society: Italy at the forefront of global aging and the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAs populations age, health, social, and long-term care policies must promote well-being, active participation, and inclusion in later life. This article examines how dissemination and participatory strategies can bridge research and practice, drawing on the Age-It Research Program-one of Europe's largest transdisciplinary initiatives on aging.
methodsAge-It involves 1,000+ researchers across 10 "Spokes" and several cross-cutting Boards, engaging more than 100 stakeholder organizations. We describe the overarching dissemination and co-creation strategy developed by the Stakeholders and Dissemination Board, acknowledging the diverse participatory practices within Spokes. We term our approach incremental participatory, recognizing both early stakeholder involvement and the practical constraints of coordinating a program of this scale.
resultsOur experience highlights three key lessons. First, establishing a shared language, timeframe, and platform is essential for transdisciplinary collaboration and stakeholder engagement. Second, dissemination and knowledge mobilization must be embedded throughout the research process rather than treated as a final stage activity, combining digital tools (e.g., WikiAge-It, the Age-It Dashboard) with offline, community-based events to foster inclusive participation. Third, while co-creation enhances legitimacy and relevance, sustaining active engagement requires significant investments in resources, infrastructures, and facilitation processes. DISCUSSION: By integrating participatory research principles with implementation science frameworks, Age-It demonstrates how structured collaboration and knowledge mobilization can support evidence-based policies and practices. However, challenges remain, including uneven stakeholder engagement, time constraints, and the difficulty of translating complex scientific insights into actionable formats. We conclude that dissemination and participatory approaches in aging research must be seen as dynamic, iterative, and resource-intensive processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.