ArticleScientific reports2025
Lightweight YOLO object detectors for PET and HDPE classification in recycling facilities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Growing volumes of plastic waste highlight the need for reliable sorting technologies. This study examines whether lightweight YOLO object detectors can distinguish polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles from high-density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles, two common packaging materials that must be separated for recycling. Two public PET and HDPE datasets were augmented offline to simulate the visual variation typical of industrial sorting lines, and eleven compact YOLO models-nano, tiny and small versions across versions 7-12-were fine-tuned on these data. Their accuracy was quantified using mean average precision (mAP) at multiple intersection-over-union thresholds and precision, recall and F1 scores; their efficiency was evaluated by inference time, size and floating-point operations. All models achieved mAP@0.5 above 99.2% and F1 scores exceeding 98% on test data. Among them, YOLOv11n delivered the best trade-off between accuracy and speed, it achieved mAP@0.5:0.95 of 93.7%, processed 640 × 640 pixel images in around 38 ms on a CPU, and required just 5.5 MB of memory. These findings suggest that accurate polymer discrimination is possible on modest hardware, enabling resource-constrained recycling facilities to reduce mis-sorting, trim costs and support a circular economy.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.