Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444393›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The development of visual acuity and crowding reveals the slow fine-tuning of foveal vision.

John A Greenwood, Marilia Kyprianou, Tessa M Dekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John A GreenwoodExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK. john.greenwood@ucl.ac.uk.
Marilia KyprianouExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Tessa M DekkerExperimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K024817/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 306332/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult visual system is characterised by high-resolution foveal vision and a peripheral field limited by crowding, the disruption to object recognition in clutter that gives a summary ‘gist’ over fine detail. In children, crowding is elevated foveally, with the estimated age where foveal crowding drops to adult-like levels varying widely from 5 to 12+ years. As crowding restricts key processes like reading, characterisation of this developmental trajectory is critical. Using methods optimised to measure crowding in children, adults and typically-developing children (n = 119; 3–13 years) judged the orientation of a foveal ‘VacMan’ target either in isolation or surrounded by ‘ghost’ flankers. For isolated elements, acuity (measured as gap-size thresholds) dropped rapidly to adult-like levels at 5–6 years. Thresholds rose when flanked/crowded, with elevations highest at 3–4 years, persisting at 5–6 years, and dropping to adult-like levels at 7–8 years. A meta-analysis of our results and 13 prior studies reveals a consistent developmental trajectory, despite wide methodological variations. We further demonstrate that developmental crowding shows the same selectivity for target-flanker similarity as peripheral crowding, consistent with common mechanisms. This prolonged development reveals a shifting balance in the visual system between the processing of fine detail vs. the ‘gist’ of the scene.

Indexed as

Fovea CentralisVisual AcuityAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleAcuityCrowdingDevelopmentFoveal visionPerceptionVision

Identifiers

PMID41444393
PMCPMC12830654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.