ArticleNature communications2025
Genetic Insights into Head-to-Body Ratios Via Deep Learning-Based Image Segmentation and Implications for Common Diseases.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic Insights into Head-to-Body Ratios Via Deep Learning-Based Image Segmentation and Implications for Common Diseases.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Head-to-body ratios (HBRs) are important anthropometric traits with direct relevance to human growth, development, and disease risk. However, the role of the proportions between head and body remains understudied, with the genetic basis of HBRs remaining largely unexplored. By applying deep learning models to 38,202 whole-body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images from the UK Biobank, we generated 10 distinct HBR phenotypes based on head (length/width) and various body dimensions. Our genome-wide association analyses identify 245 significant loci, with SNP-based heritability estimates ranging from 25% to 43%. Functional annotations show that genes prioritized for HBRs are enriched in chondrocytes in skeletal tissues and oligodendrocytes across multiple brain regions. Polygenic risk scores and mendelian randomization analyses further showed that HBRs are significantly associated with risks for cardiovascular, metabolic, musculoskeletal, and neuropsychiatric diseases, underscoring their potential value as health-related biomarkers. Evolutionary analyses show that HBR-associated variants are enriched in conserved genomic regions and human accelerated regions, particularly those influencing brain development. Overall, our study provides insights into the genetic architectures of HBRs, establishes their relevance to major human diseases, and offers evolutionary context for their biological significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.