ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2025
Improved sex-specific cardiovascular risk prediction with multi-omics data in people with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-empowered, clinically-integrated multiomics research in thrombosis: a call to action.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate whether integrating proteomics, metabolomics, and a cardiovascular disease specific polygenic risk score (CVD-PRS) in the SCORE2-Diabetes model improves sex-specific 10-year prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).
methodsGenome-wide association study (GWAS), plasma proteomics (with the Olink Explore 3072 platform), and metabolomics (with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy by Nightingale Health) data were measured in the UK Biobank. A novel sex-specific protein algorithm was developed using bootstrap-LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression. The CVD-PRS and sex-specific metabolite algorithms were used from previous UK Biobank projects. In a subset of 990 participants with T2D, age 40-69 years, with no prior MACE, and complete multi-omics data, we evaluated, which omics data improved the SCORE2-Diabetes model performance using Harrell's C-index.
resultsOverall 9 proteins were selected for males and 7 for females and adding them to the SCORE2-Diabetes model significantly improved discrimination in the total population (C-index increase from 0.766 to 0.835 (P < 0.001)). Further adding of metabolites significantly improved model performance (C-index, 0.846, P = 0.035), which was mostly attributable to model improvement among males (∆C-index, 0.012, P = 0.078) but not among females (∆C-index, 0.004, P = 0.723). Further adding the CVD-PRS did not statistically significantly improve the SCORE2-Diabetes + proteomics + metabolomics model further in the total population (C-index, 0.848 (P = 0.070)).
conclusionsSex-specific proteomic signatures markedly improved 10-year MACE risk prediction in individuals with T2D. In men but not in women, further integration of metabolomics may enhance model performance whereas adding the CVD-PRS is not needed. External validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.