Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41444701›Full record

ArticleAnimal microbiome2025

Effects of naturalistic housing conditions on amphibian growth and microbiome in captivity.

Justin C Touchon, Myra C Hughey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin C TouchonBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA. jutouchon@vassar.edu.
Myra C HugheyBiology Department, Vassar College, 124 Raymond Ave, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12604, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnimals in captivity are inherently separated from their natural environments, which both exposes them to new heterospecific organisms as well as reduces contact with naturally occurring predators, prey or microbiota. The microbes that live on and in animals are increasingly recognized as having important impacts on animal health, development and behavior. We raised post-metamorphic treefrogs in 1) naturalistic containers in groups, 2) regularly sterilized containers in groups, or 3) regularly sterilized containers but solitary. Froglets were raised for over eight months; in addition to monitoring growth and development, we collected fecal samples on three occasions, gut samples on two occasions, and skin swab samples once. We compared the diversity of microbial communities across sample types and over time.

resultsFroglets raised in group housing, either naturalistic or regularly cleaned, had the fastest growth and sexual differentiation, but naturalistic housing also improved survival. Alpha diversity of bacteria on the skin or in the gut did not vary with rearing conditions, whereas diversity in the gut increased over time. Alpha diversity of feces did vary with rearing treatment and changed over time. Bacterial community composition (beta diversity) varied most strongly with sample type, but also with rearing conditions and over time. In addition, bacterial communities of feces were highly correlated with those of guts, indicating that feces can serve as an accurate and non-invasive biomarker of the gut microbiome. Lastly, transferring frogs from regularly sterilized environments to naturalistic vivaria improved bacterial community diversity.

conclusionsOur study suggests that naturalistic housing improves the overall health and development of captive amphibians and that these improvements may occur by facilitating a more stable and diverse microbiome.

Indexed as

AnuranBacteriaConservationDevelopmentDiseaseIACUCMetamorphosisMicrobiomeSymbiont

Identifiers

PMID41444701
PMCPMC12729447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.