ArticleScientific reports2025
Assessment of gait speed in older adults using a short-distance walking test with smartphone motion sensors and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association Between Function-focused Training and Physical Function Among Community-dwelling Oldest-old Individuals: A Retrospective Study.Juntendo medical journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classical gait speed tests rely on the existence of a flat surface of 4 to 15 meters, distance that is not always available in clinical settings. To address this space constraint and to preserve the well–reported clinical outcomes associated with the gait speed test, the present work investigates the potential of a set of machine learning models to predict the gait speed in older adults, but by means of a short–distance test. To enhance screening, the present framework adopts a risk–stratification model, categorizing gait speed into four strata rather than treating it as a continuous variable. Motion data were obtained with a smartphone from over two hundred older adults. Feature extraction consisted of time– and frequency–domain quantities derived from the acceleration and angular velocity signals based on the discrete wavelet transform and power spectral density. Feature selection was investigated by the ReliefF algorithm. Among the several model setups evaluated, the k–Nearest Neighbors classifier is the one that provided the best predictions (median [95% CI] – accuracy: 0.969 [0.963–0.974]; F1-score: 0.971 [0.964–0.975]; AUC: 0.980 [0.975–0.984]). Based on these figures, the proposed strategy is a promising approach to provide clinicians with a reliable and straightforward gait speed stratification in cases where the classical test is not feasible due to space constraints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.