ArticleScientific reports2025
Probiotics intervention reduces oxidative stress-driven myocardial injury.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aging is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, characterized by progressive structural and functional decline in the heart. In addition to oxidative stress, which is a key player in aging, recent research suggests that the gut-heart axis may contribute to age-related cardiac dysfunction, with probiotics emerging as a potential therapeutic strategy. While probiotics have been extensively studied for their benefits in metabolic, neurological, and immune disorders, their impact on cardiac aging remains largely unexplored. This study investigates the cardioprotective effects of Lacticaseibacillus casei and Bifidobacterium breve in a D-galactose-induced aging model. Male BALB/c mice were subcutaneously injected with D-galactose (100 mg/kg) to induce aging and subsequently received oral supplementation with L. casei (2 × 109 CFU/mL), B. breve (2 × 109 CFU/mL), or their combination (2 × 109 CFU/mL) daily for eight weeks. The results revealed that probiotics mitigated myocardial damage, including inflammation, congestion, cardiomyocyte degeneration, edema, and fibrosis. Furthermore, probiotics enhanced Sirt1 gene expression, increased glutathione (GSH) levels, and reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, highlighting their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties in ameliorating cardiac aging. We found that L. casei demonstrated superior performance compared to B. breve, and the combination therapy outperformed the single-strain treatments. Overall, these findings suggest that probiotic interventions may serve as a promising strategy for combating oxidative stress and age-related cardiac deterioration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.