ArticleCommunications biology2025
Neuronal mismatch responses to auditory stimuli in the dorsal hippocampus of anesthetized rats.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural auditory behaviors invoke cognitive brain networks.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Neuronal mismatch responses to auditory stimuli in the dorsal hippocampus of anesthetized rats.Communications biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hippocampus is classically linked to memory, yet increasing evidence points to a broader role in perceptual inference and deviance detection. Predictive coding theories propose that perception minimizes mismatches between expected and actual sensory input, expressed in neural signatures such as mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300. Although MMN arises mainly from sensory and prefrontal cortices, the hippocampus is anatomically interconnected with both and may also contribute to prediction error processing. We recorded single- and multi-unit activity and local field potentials (LFPs) from DG and CA1 in urethane-anesthetized rats during an auditory oddball paradigm and a no-repetition control sequence to dissociate prediction error from repetition suppression. Approximately 20% of hippocampal neurons were sound responsive, and a subset showed deviant selectivity. Spiking activity predominantly reflected prediction errors, while LFPs revealed complementary contributions from repetition suppression and prediction error. Early LFP components were enhanced for randomly presented deviants, whereas later components within the P300 latency range were stronger for predictable deviants, indicating temporally distinct phases of error signaling and top-down modulation. These findings identify the hippocampus as an active contributor to auditory deviance detection and support a hierarchical model in which hippocampal circuits participate in predictive sensory processing beyond memory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.