Evidence mapPaperPMID 41445111Full record

ReviewHuman reproduction update2026

Epitranscriptomic modifications in embryonic development: insights into natural and ART-induced mechanisms and implications.

Alessandro M Volsa, Eva R Hoffmann, Pablo J Ross, Sebastian Canovas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human reproduction update, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alessandro M VolsaDepartment of Physiology, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research (Campus Mare Nostrum), University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Eva R HoffmannDNRF Center for Chromosome Stability, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pablo J RossSTgenetics, Navasota, TX, USA.
Sebastian CanovasDepartment of Physiology, International Excellence Campus for Higher Education and Research (Campus Mare Nostrum), University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4190-6258

Funding

AFRODITA Doctoral NetworkEuropean Union's Horizon EuropeMSCA Doctoral Network 101120126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMammalian embryo development involves a complex process governed by multiple layers of cellular and molecular regulation mechanisms. ART is widely used around the world to assist fertility in humans, with ∼12 million babies being born by ART in the last 40 years. These technologies are also used extensively for reproductive purposes in other mammalian species that have many analogies with human reproductive biology. Epitranscriptomic marks, including RNA modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and N1-methyladenosine (m1A), modulate gene expression during gametogenesis and embryo development, and their dynamics are regulated by genes encoding m6A writers (METTL3, METTL14, and WTAP), readers (YTHDF2, YTHDC1-2, and PRRC2A), and erasers (ALKBH5 and FTO). However, the impact of ART on these epigenetic modifications remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE: This narrative review explores the role of epitranscriptomic modifications in both naturally and ART-conceived embryos. It examines how RNA modifications regulate gametogenesis and early embryonic development and how ART-induced cellular stress might perturb these regulatory layers, potentially affecting gametogenesis, embryo competence, and offspring health. Understanding the interaction between ART and epitranscriptomic regulation is crucial for optimizing ART procedures and safeguarding offspring health. SEARCH

methodsThe PubMed and Scopus literature databases were utilized to search for peer-reviewed articles and reviews using terms such as 'epitranscriptomic', 'RNA modification', 'gametogenesis', 'embryo development', 'mammalian development', 'in vitro fertilization', 'ART', and 'assisted reproductive technologies' in combination or individually. All relevant publications until the current year have been critically evaluated and discussed. OUTCOMES: Epitranscriptomic modifications, particularly m6A, have emerged as key regulators of RNA metabolism during gametogenesis and early embryo development. Evidence from both human and animal studies indicates that ART-related stressors, such as oxidative imbalance, hormonal stimulation, and cryopreservation, can disturb RNA methylation at the epitranscriptomic marks m1A and 5-methylcytosine by modulating the expression and activity of m6A writers, erasers, and readers, independently of global transcriptional changes. These alterations can affect embryo competence, placental function, lineage specification, and subsequent offspring development. Moreover, m6A-associated factors participate in stress adaptation and developmental signalling beyond their canonical methylation activity. Collectively, these findings underscore the remarkable sensitivity of the embryonic transcriptome to in vitro manipulation and highlight epitranscriptomic marks as both predictive biomarkers and mechanistic targets for improving the safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes of assisted reproduction. WIDER IMPLICATIONS: Understanding how ARTs influence the epitranscriptome and its downstream effects is crucial for improving reproductive outcomes. In vitro manipulation, fertilization, and embryo culture can influence RNA regulation in gametes, causing reduced cell differentiation, and, in early embryos, contributing to recurrent implantation failure, decidualization failure, and pregnancy loss. This review aims to share with the scientific community insights into the critical role of epitranscriptomic modifications during gametogenesis and embryogenesis, as well as the potential consequences of in vitro procedures, to guide safer and more effective ART practices. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Embryonic DevelopmentEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalReproductive Techniques, AssistedTranscriptomeAdenosineAnimalsGametogenesisHumansAdenosineN-methyladenosineassisted reproductive technologiesdevelopmentembryo cultureembryogenesisepitranscriptomicsgametogenesisin vitro fertilizationoffspring healthRNA modification

Identifiers

PMID41445111
PMCPMC13017785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.