ArticleCancer science2026
Urinary Tumor DNA to Identify Candidates for Repeat Transurethral Resection in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Tumor Function: A Systems Biology Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Genitourinary Cancers.Genes · 2026Review
- Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Recent Advances in Early Detection, Treatment Prediction, and Prognosis.Oncology research · 2026Review
- A risk-adapted approach to reTURBT in high-grade T1 NMIBC.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) is commonly recommended for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) with high-risk features, although many individuals may undergo unnecessary procedures that increase morbidity without clear benefit. Urinary tumor DNA (utDNA) has emerged as a promising biomarker, and we evaluated the performance of a multidimensional utDNA assay (utLIFE) in this context. In a retrospective cohort of 161 patients who underwent re-TURBT between May 2020 and May 2025, urine samples collected 2-6 weeks after initial TURBT were analyzed using utLIFE, which integrates shallow whole-genome sequencing and targeted sequencing of 155 genes with machine learning-based classification. Residual tumor was identified in 35% of patients, and utLIFE demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity of 80.7%, specificity of 96.2%, and overall accuracy of 90.7%, markedly outperforming urine cytology. A positive utLIFE result was the strongest independent predictor of residual disease (OR = 77.5, 95% CI: 22.4-268.2, p < 0.001). During a median follow-up of 32.5 months, recurrence occurred in 20.5% of patients; recurrence was defined as urothelial tumor relapse within the urinary tract and did not include distant metastasis. utLIFE positivity was significantly associated with shorter recurrence-free survival (HR = 16.4, 95% CI: 2.7-101.8, p = 0.003). Longitudinal testing further revealed that utDNA positivity frequently preceded cystoscopic evidence of recurrence by several months. These findings highlight the strong diagnostic and prognostic value of utDNA in identifying residual disease and predicting recurrence, supporting its potential role in refining postoperative management strategies for NMIBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.