ArticleInternational journal of telerehabilitation2025
Current Status of Telerehabilitation Services in Low-Middle Income Countries - A Scoping Review.
Article in International journal of telerehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Meta-Synthesis on Clients' Experience with Telerehabilitation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging evidence and care for knee osteoarthritis in China: a randomized feasibility trial with RE-AIM-guided process evaluation of the PEAK-CHN model of care.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telerehabilitation adoption in low-middle income countries (LMICs) accelerated during COVID-19 pandemic, promoting a surge in telehealth initiatives, many of which remain unexplored. This scoping review aims to assess the current state of telerehabilitation services in LMICs across Asia and Africa using Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework with PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Two reviews were conducted: one covering from 2012 to 2022 and another from 2023 to January 2025, yielding a total of 87 relevant articles. The key themes that emerged from the collected literature include current telerehabilitation status, pandemic utilization, implementation challenges, user understanding of telerehabilitation along with their perceptions and practices, and feasibility together with legal-ethical aspects and acceptability. Despite limited ICT skills and infrastructure challenges, users reported positive experiences, primarily using mobile phones and video conferences. However, privacy concerns along with digital literacy issues remain. Although many nations adopted WHO guidelines and donor support, formal policies and sustainable implementation strategies are still lacking. The findings underscore the need for context specific and sustainable frameworks to strengthen telerehabilitation in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.