Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41445902›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer2025

Roadmap to Success: Illustrating Insights from a KAP Study on Cervical Cancer Prevention and HPV Vaccination.

Priya Ganeshkumar, Jaydeep Tank, Saswati Sanyal Choudhury, Veena Acharya, Yashodhara Gaur, Reena Srivastava, Revathy Janakiraman, Akshay Ganeshkumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Priya GaneshkumarGynaecologic Oncologic Committee, Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), Sainiwas Healthcare, Thane, Maharashtra, India.
Jaydeep TankDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India (FOGSI), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Saswati Sanyal ChoudhuryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gauhati Medical College, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Veena AcharyaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajasthan Hospital, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Yashodhara GaurDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, G. R. Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Reena SrivastavaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, B. R. D. Medical College, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Revathy JanakiramanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (IOG), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Akshay GaneshkumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cervical cancer is a public health challenge in low- and middle-income countries, with India ranking among the highest in cervical cancer burden. The World Health Organization (has set ambitious targets for cervical cancer elimination by 2030, emphasizing the importance of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening. In response, the National Technical Advisory Group of Immunization recommends the introduction of HPV vaccination for all eligible girls aged 9 to 14 years in India under the Universal Immunization Program. However, successful implementation requires both vaccine availability and changes in health care providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding cervical cancer prevention and HPV vaccination. Methodology: This study aims to assess KAP among clinicians regarding cervical cancer and HPV vaccination. A cross-sectional survey collected responses from 451 practicing gynecologists and medical practitioners across 15 states of India. The questionnaire sought insights into patient inquiries, information sources, awareness levels, methods of patient education, and common myths and misconceptions. Results: Results indicate a high prevalence of patient inquiries about cervical cancer and the HPV vaccine, emphasizing the need for accurate and accessible information. While doctors were generally knowledgeable, misconceptions persisted among patients, including beliefs about low risk, inevitability of cervical cancer, and concerns about vaccine safety. Doctors primarily relied on verbal communication for patient education, suggesting potential for utilizing digital platforms and visual aids to enhance outreach. Insights: Insights from doctors underscored the importance of addressing misinformation and leveraging various communication channels, including social media, posters, and celebrity endorsements, to improve awareness and acceptance of vaccination. Disparities in vaccine availability and administration rates highlighted the need for targeted interventions to ensure equitable access. Limitations: Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional design and reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce bias. However, findings suggest a need for ongoing medical education and collaboration with stakeholders to drive awareness and acceptance of HPV vaccination. Conclusion: In conclusion, while gynecologists and medical practitioners demonstrate adequate KAP regarding cervical cancer prevention, there is room for improvement in patient education and communication strategies. Refining educational materials and strengthening communication channels would enhance awareness and reduce cervical cancer burden.

Indexed as

cervical cancerHPVhuman papillomavirusknowledge-attitude-practicespreventionpublic healthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID41445902
PMCPMC12727005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.