ReviewCardiac failure review2025
Ventricular-Arterial Coupling in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Bibliometric Review and Clinical Implications.
Review in Cardiac failure review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidomain Arterial Afterload and Left Atrial-Left Ventricular Coupling in Hypertensive Phenotypes.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2026Article
- Left Ventricular Longitudinal Strain Is Associated with Ascending Aortic Diameters in Healthy Adults-A Detailed Single-Center Retrospective Analysis from the Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiographic MAGYAR-Healthy Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Heart Failure with Supranormal Ejection Fraction: An Emerging High-Risk Phenotype Within the Preserved Ejection Fraction Spectrum-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Association Between Diastolic Dysfunction and Postoperative Heart Failure in Non-cardiac Surgeries.Cardiac failure review · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure remains a growing global health burden, and early disruptions in ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) contribute to its pathogenesis, particularly in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We conducted an integrative bibliometric and thematic review of Web of Science records (search on 1 March 2025; coverage through December 2024) to map how VAC has evolved from a mechanistic construct to a clinically actionable framework in HFpEF. Output accelerated since 2006, with four core clusters spanning haemodynamics, right ventricle- pulmonary artery coupling, arterial stiffness, and clinical imaging. VAC has steadily moved physiological constructs toward clinical risk stratification, especially in HFpEF and right ventricular dysfunction. Important gaps include non-standardised assessment and limited prospective validation of VAC-targeted interventions. This review synthesises mechanistic and clinical evidence across the left atrial, left ventricular, and right ventricle-pulmonary artery axes and, on that basis, sets practical priorities for measurement standardisation and prospective validation within a whole-heart perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.