ArticleBMJ open2025
Can a digital intervention 'Momentum' improve social functioning and transdiagnostic symptoms for Australian youth at ultrahigh risk for psychosis? Protocol for a superiority randomised controlled trial comparing treatment as usual with and without Momentum.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionExisting psychological and pharmacological interventions for young people at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis have shown benefit in at least delaying the transition to psychosis, but they have limited benefit for comorbid disorders or social dysfunction, which are prominent for those at UHR. We developed a moderated online social therapy platform (named Momentum) including: (1) transdiagnostic therapeutic interventions targeting social functioning, depression, generalised anxiety and social anxiety; (2) a moderated, peer-led online community and (3) specialised human support from clinicians, career consultants and peer workers. The aim of this trial is to determine whether, in addition to treatment as usual (TAU), Momentum, a 12-month digital intervention, informed by the complex intervention framework, is superior to 12 months of TAU in improving social functioning in UHR young people. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study design is a prospective, parallel group, rater-masked randomised controlled trial. We will recruit young people aged 14-27 years, meeting one or more UHR for psychosis criteria. Participants are randomly assigned to the condition using randomly permutated blocks with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants are stratified by age (<18 years and ≥18 years), sex at birth and recruitment site. A total of 220 young people will be recruited, allowing for an 18% attrition rate following randomisation. The study includes a 12-month treatment phase, with assessment points at baseline, and 4 months, 8 months and 12 months. The primary outcome is social functioning, as measured by the Global Functioning Social Scale. Secondary outcomes include the severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms, social anxiety, role functioning, study and employment outcomes and cost-effectiveness. We will also examine potential mechanisms to understand Momentum's therapeutic impact on social functioning. Primary analyses will be undertaken on an intention-to-treat basis. Mixed-model repeated measures analyses will be used to compare change in social functioning between the two treatment groups over the 12-month follow-up for primary, secondary and exploratory outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Melbourne Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/42964/MH-2018) provided ethics approval for this study. Findings will be made available through scientific journals and forums and to the public via social media and the Orygen website. De-identified individual participant data will be available after publication for 3 years via the Health Data Australia catalogue (https://www.researchdata.edu.au/health). Requests must include a methodologically sound proposal. Specific conditions of use may apply and will be specified in a data sharing agreement (or similar) that the requester must agree to before access is granted. Supplementary material including study protocol, informed consent material and statistical analysis plan will also be available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR), ACTRN12619001411134.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.