Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449209›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Analysis of volatile organic compounds in biological samples of colorectal cancer patients using electronic nose-based machine learning techniques.

Nada E Ahmed, Mohamed S Mshaly, Khaled M Madbouly, Marwa A Mohamed, Ebtsam A Abdel-Wahab, Ehab I Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nada E AhmedMedical Biophysics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 5433005, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0008-8064-2519
Mohamed S MshalyPhysics Department, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-2579-8533
Khaled M MadboulySugery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9795-653X
Marwa A MohamedChemical Pathology Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-5294-4762
Ebtsam A Abdel-WahabBiomedical Equipment Technology Department, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences Technology, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0009-0000-5317-4088
Ehab I MohamedMedical Biophysics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 El-Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 5433005, Egypt. eimohamed@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-1928

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden characterized by prolonged asymptomatic progression and high mortality. CRC curability improves with early-stage detection, and removing precancerous adenomas allows for prevention, emphasizing the significance of screening. This prospective study, conducted between 2024 and 2025 with 100 randomly recruited participants, investigates eNose-based analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in biological matrices for CRC diagnosis using both unsupervised and supervised machine learning (ML) techniques. After detailed medical examinations, laboratory tests, and colonoscopy, 50 patients with confirmed stage III CRC and 50 healthy controls agreed to have their blood, urine, and stool samples analyzed by the eNose technique. Principal component analysis (PCA), logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and gradient boosting (GB) were used to analyze eNose VOC patterns in all biological matrices. Clinical and hematological alterations in CRC patients were consistent with systemic malignancy, including reduced weight, mild anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia, all of which are established indicators of disease severity and prognostic markers. Elevated VOC responses in CRC patients across all matrices, with blood and stool proving most informative due to favorable signal-to-noise ratios. Ensemble- and proximity-based models GB and KNN were found to be superior to LR classifiers, with GB exhibiting balanced and adaptable performance across different biological matrices. Limiting the study to stage III CRC patients improved VOC signal clarity but limited early-stage generalizability, a constraint effectively mitigated by Gaussian augmentation, which enriched data variability and boosted model performance for screening applications. Thus, eNose-based ML systems provide a globally accessible, innovative, non-invasive, and affordable solution for CRC detection, combining high sensitivity and specificity to support widespread early diagnosis.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsElectronic NoseMachine LearningVolatile Organic CompoundsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFecesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesVolatile Organic CompoundsCancer screeningColorectal cancer (CRC)Electronic nose (eNose)Headspace analysisMachine learning (ML)Volatile organic compounds (VOCs)

Identifiers

PMID41449209
PMCPMC12748548

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.