ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of volatile organic compounds in biological samples of colorectal cancer patients using electronic nose-based machine learning techniques.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanostructured Tin- and Titanium-Based Chemoresistive Sensors for Detecting Volatile Fingerprints from Colorectal Cancer Biopsies and Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Electronic nose versus gas chromatography - mass spectrometry for diagnostic discrimination of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma by volatolomic analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health burden characterized by prolonged asymptomatic progression and high mortality. CRC curability improves with early-stage detection, and removing precancerous adenomas allows for prevention, emphasizing the significance of screening. This prospective study, conducted between 2024 and 2025 with 100 randomly recruited participants, investigates eNose-based analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in biological matrices for CRC diagnosis using both unsupervised and supervised machine learning (ML) techniques. After detailed medical examinations, laboratory tests, and colonoscopy, 50 patients with confirmed stage III CRC and 50 healthy controls agreed to have their blood, urine, and stool samples analyzed by the eNose technique. Principal component analysis (PCA), logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and gradient boosting (GB) were used to analyze eNose VOC patterns in all biological matrices. Clinical and hematological alterations in CRC patients were consistent with systemic malignancy, including reduced weight, mild anemia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia, all of which are established indicators of disease severity and prognostic markers. Elevated VOC responses in CRC patients across all matrices, with blood and stool proving most informative due to favorable signal-to-noise ratios. Ensemble- and proximity-based models GB and KNN were found to be superior to LR classifiers, with GB exhibiting balanced and adaptable performance across different biological matrices. Limiting the study to stage III CRC patients improved VOC signal clarity but limited early-stage generalizability, a constraint effectively mitigated by Gaussian augmentation, which enriched data variability and boosted model performance for screening applications. Thus, eNose-based ML systems provide a globally accessible, innovative, non-invasive, and affordable solution for CRC detection, combining high sensitivity and specificity to support widespread early diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.