ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
Machine learning prediction of pediatric adverse drug reactions using consensus-derived scarce data.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Informative relational learning for adverse reaction prediction with enhanced generalization to novel drugs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence, equity, and pediatric neurodevelopmental disorders: A scoping review of clinical practice applications.Pediatric investigation · 2026Review
- A manufacturer-aware cross-system benchmark for pediatric pharmacovigilance signal concordance.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) represent a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children, who face distinct pharmacological vulnerabilities due to unique physiological development. Current pediatric drug safety research is hindered by limited clinical data and adult-focused studies, creating evidence gaps. We developed a comprehensive computational approach for pediatric pharmacovigilance, integrating consensus-driven signal detection, multi-level biological features, and interpretable machine learning. Using 1.4 million FDA Adverse Event Reporting System reports, we constructed the largest curated pediatric drug-ADR dataset. Severity-specific thresholds and voting across four algorithms (PRR, ROR, BCPNN, and EBGM) optimized ADR identification. Multi-level biological fingerprints spanning molecular, target, and network domains combined with XGBoost significantly improved predictive performance (ROC AUC: 0.7177), especially for imbalanced scenarios. Cross-domain analyses revealed that models trained on adult data exhibit poor generalization to pediatric contexts, confirming that adverse reactions in children cannot be reliably predicted using adult data. Our approach successfully identified established and novel pediatric-specific ADRs with strong literature support. Collectively, this work establishes methodological innovations for pediatric pharmacovigilance, bridges a critical evidence gap in pediatric drug safety, and delivers practical tools for clinical and regulatory decision-making.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.