Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41449298›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2025

Evaluation of INR101, a PSMA-Targeted

Jigang Yang, Wuzhou Wan, Jinming Zhang, Ning Zhang, Xing Yang, Wei Wang, Huan Ma, Yanfeng Xu, Zhizhen Fu, Xuejuan Wang and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06472531 (A Phase I/IIa Study of PET/CT Imaging Using INR101 Injection in Healthy Male Subjects and Patients With Suspected Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06472531 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase I/IIa Study of PET/CT Imaging Using INR101 Injection in Healthy Male Subjects and Patients With Suspected Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorYunhe Pharmaceutical (Tianjin) Co., LtdRan2024 to 2024Enrolled32ConditionsHealthy Male Subjects, Suspected Prostate CancerArmsINR101
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jigang Yang *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, China.
Wuzhou Wan *Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd., No.3686 Yunnan Baiyao Street, Chenggong District, 650034, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China.
Jinming ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, 100039, Beijing, China. zhangjm301@163.com.
Ning ZhangYunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd., No.3686 Yunnan Baiyao Street, Chenggong District, 650034, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. zhangning@ynby.cn.
Xing YangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, 100044, Beijing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, China.
Huan MaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, China.
Yanfeng XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, China.
Zhizhen FuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, 95 Yong'an Road, Xicheng District, 100050, Beijing, China.
Xuejuan WangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (PET-CT Center), Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, 100021, Beijing, China.
Yuan LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine (PET-CT Center), Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, 100021, Beijing, China.
Mingshuai WangDepartment of Urology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, 100021, Beijing, China.
Fugeng LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Hospital, 1 Dongdan Dahu Road, Dongcheng District, 100005, Beijing, China.
Yue GuoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Beijing Hospital, 1 Dongdan Dahu Road, Dongcheng District, 100005, Beijing, China.
Yachao LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, 100039, Beijing, China.
Xiaojun ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, 100039, Beijing, China.

Funding

Yunnan Baiyao Group Co., Ltd. YNYY-INR101-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies among men worldwide. Early detection relies heavily on imaging accuracy, yet conventional modalities such as CT and MRI have limitations in identifying early-stage lesions. INR101 is a novel 18F-labeled PSMA-targeted PET tracer with high binding affinity, favorable biodistribution, and promising lesion detection capabilities for initial PCa diagnosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsINR101 was prepared and confirmed on radiochemical purity by HPLC to be > 93%. Entire production process was carried out in a manufacturing facility compliant with cGMP standards, and each production batch was tested for sterility and endotoxin levels. This multicenter, prospective, open-label Phase I/IIa trial included 8 healthy male volunteers (Phase I) and 24 treatment-naive patients with suspected prostate cancer (PSA ≥ 3 ng/mL, scheduled for biopsy; Phase IIa). Phase I evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and dosimetry of INR101 (9 ± 1 mCi). Phase IIa randomized patients 1:1 to 7 ± 1 mCi (n = 12) or 9 ± 1 mCi (n = 12) groups, with PET/CT scans at 80 ± 10 and 120 ± 10 min post-injection. Primary endpoints: Phase I (safety/dosimetry); Phase IIa (diagnostic efficacy vs. biopsy pathology). Exploratory endpoint: INR101 vs. mpMRI. The study was approved by ethics committees (2024LP01109) and registered (ChiCTR20240522, NCT06472531).

resultsIn Phase I, INR101 showed rapid systemic distribution with primary uptake in the liver, kidneys, and salivary glands and a mean effective radiation dose was 7.6 ± 1.2 mSv. In Phase IIa trial, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the low-dose group (7 ± 1 mCi), reached 100% (95% CI:39.8%-100.0%), 85.7% (95% CI:42.1%-99.6%), and 90.9% (95% CI:58.7%-99.8%), respectively; while that of the high-dose group (9 ± 1 mCi) were 87.5% (95% CI: 47.35%, 99.68%), 75.0% (95% CI: 19.41%, 99.37%), and 83.3% (95% CI: 51.59%, 97.91%). INR101 PET/CT demonstrated higher specificity and accuracy than multiparametric MRI. [low-dose group (7 ± 1 mCi): specificity 85.7% (95% CI:42.1%-99.6%) vs. mpMRI 60.0% (95% CI:14.7%-94.7%); accuracy 90.9% (95% CI:58.7%-99.8%) vs. mpMRI 78.3% (95% CI:56.3%-92.5%)], with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). No serious adverse events occurred in either Phase I or IIa.

conclusionINR101 is safe and well-tolerated, with high diagnostic accuracy for detecting PSMA-positive prostate lesions. Optimal imaging was achieved at 7 ± 1 mCi with an uptake time of 80–120 min. Its favorable pharmacokinetics and superior diagnostic performance with low urinary tract interference suggest that INR101 PET/CT may be a valuable tool for early PCa detection, meriting further validation in larger clinical studies.

Indexed as

BiodistributionDiagnostic efficacyINR101 PET/CTProstate cancer (PCa)PSMA-targeted imaging

Identifiers

PMID41449298
PMCPMC12852546

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.