ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnosing the innovation atmosphere of industrial parks through urban spatial perception: a multimodal large language model approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The innovation atmosphere of industrial parks, a crucial indicator of urban spatial vitality and regional economic dynamism, is difficult to assess using traditional, experience-driven methods. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a novel, data-driven framework for urban spatial perception using Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). Focusing on typical industrial parks in Wuhan, China, we harnessed MLLMs to interpret multi-source urban data, validating their diagnostic accuracy against expert evaluations. Subsequently, we simulated the diverse cognitive perspectives of four key stakeholder groups to diagnose the innovation atmosphere, diagnose the innovation atmosphere, quantifying the subjective spatial perceptions of different user groups and reflecting a nuanced understanding of human-environment interactions. The principal findings are: (1) The diagnostic assessments from the Gemini-2.5-pro model demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.890, p < 0.001) with the expert judgment baseline, affirming the high feasibility of this data-driven approach. (2) The MLLM framework effectively quantified perceptual heterogeneity among simulated stakeholders, offering deep insights into the varied dimensions of the parks' city image and perceived quality. (3) Spatial analysis revealed a consistent overall assessment of the innovation atmosphere across different perspectives, with parks in the southeastern and northwestern regions exhibiting higher spatial vitality. This research contributes an objective and automated tool for diagnosing the innovation atmosphere, a key facet of urban spatial perception. Crucially, the proposed framework provides robust empirical support for big data-driven strategies in urban planning, enabling the refined management of innovation spaces to be more productive, collaborative, and sustainable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.