ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2025
Factors contributing to inaccurate migraine diagnosis: a prospective study at a tertiary hospital in Southern Thailand.
Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Migraine 1-2-3-4-5: a candidate communication aid for adult migraine without aura.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Article
- Pediatric migraine: Neurodevelopmental mechanisms, clinical phenotypes, and modern therapeutics.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Causal cross-trait mapping at single-cell resolution identifies shared immunogenetic drivers of migraine and Meniere's disease.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMigraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder, yet diagnostic accuracy remains suboptimal, especially in non-specialist settings. Misdiagnosis may lead to delayed treatment, medication overuse, and reduced quality of life. The objective of this study was to estimate the proportion of patients with migraine attending the headache clinic who were misdiagnosed or not diagnosed as having migraine before attending the headache clinic, and to identify factors associated with inaccurate migraine diagnosis among patients before attending a tertiary hospital in Southern Thailand.
methodsA prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted at Songkhla Hospital between July 2024 and April 2025. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a final migraine diagnosis confirmed by two blinded independent neurologists were enrolled. Participants were divided into two groups: (1) an appropriate diagnosis group, defined as patients who received a correct diagnosis of migraine at their initial consultation with any physicians prior to attending the headache clinic; and (2) an inappropriate diagnosis group, defined as patients who were previously misdiagnosed with another headache disorder or had not been diagnosed with migraine before their headache clinic visit. Data on demographics, clinical features, and the specialty of the first attending physician were analyzed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.
results90 patients were included (87.8% female, mean age 43.4 ± 14.8 years). 43.3% had been misdiagnosed at their initial visit. The most common incorrect diagnoses were tension-type headache and sinusitis. Multivariable analysis identified five independent factors significantly associated with inappropriate diagnosis: male sex (adjusted OR 7.77, 95% CI 1.07-56.50, p = 0.043), bilateral headache (aOR 3.90, 95% CI 1.25-12.13, p = 0.019), lack of worsening by physical activity (aOR 5.09, 95% CI 1.54-16.89, p = 0.008), presence of vertigo/dizziness (aOR 4.39, 95% CI 1.22-15.83, p = 0.024) and initial consultation with a non-neurologist (aOR 7.92, 95% CI 2.63-23.88, p < 0.001),.
conclusionMisdiagnosis of migraine remains frequent in clinical practice, particularly among patients initially evaluated by non-neurologists. Atypical symptom profiles-such as bilateral pain, lack of activity-related exacerbation, or associated vertigo-contribute to diagnostic inaccuracy. Enhanced awareness and targeted education for primary physicians are essential to improve diagnostic precision and reduce treatment delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.